Anterior 15 / 16 Próximo

30/9/22, 14:55 Oversight Board | Independent Judgment. Transparency. Legitimacy. II. The relationship between the Community Standards and the Community Guidelines: The Board recommends that Facebook: Revise the “short” explanation of the Instagram Community Guidelines to clarify that the ban on adult nudity is not absolute; Revise the “long” explanation of the Instagram Community Guidelines to clarify that visible female nipples can be shown to raise breast cancer awareness; Clarify that the Instagram Community Guidelines are interpreted in line with the Facebook Community Standards, and where there are inconsistencies the latter take precedence. *Procedural note: The Oversight Board’s decisions are prepared by panels of five Members and must be agreed by a majority of the Board. Board decisions do not necessarily represent the personal views of all Members. Date published Jan 28, 2021 Platform Instagram Relevant Community Standard Adult nudity and sexual activity Related topics Health, Safety Region Latin America and the Caribbean Country(s) affected Brazil https://www.oversightboard.com/decision/IG-7THR3SI1 15/16

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Oversight Board Case of Breast Cancer Symptoms and Nudity

Case Law

Country

Brazil

Country Location

Latitud: -9.531069703582213

Longitud: -52.923056365109474

Country Location (vinculado Case Law): Brazil

Decision Date: 28 ene 2021

Case Status: Cerrado

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Overturned Meta’s initial decision

Keywords

Instagram Community Guidelines>Hate Speech, Bullying and Abuse

Judicial Body: Meta's Oversight Board

Court Name: Oversight Board

Case Number: 2020-004-IG-UA

Case Summary: On January 28, 2021, the Oversight Board overturned Facebook’s (now Meta) decision to remove a post on Instagram with images of visible and uncovered female nipples intended to raise awareness about breast cancer and its symptoms. Facebook removed the post through an automated machine-learning classifier, enforcing Facebook’s Community Standards on Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity. Although Facebook restored the post recognizing an enforcement error, the Board issued a decision on the matter. It argued that Facebook’s decision did not comply with its Community Standards since adult nudity is allowed for educational and medical purposes such as raising awareness about breast cancer. Likewise, the Oversight Board considered that Facebook’s original decision affected the users’ right to receive information about health-related issues and disproportionately impacted women, raising discrimination concerns.

*The Oversight Board is a separate entity from Meta and will provide its independent judgment on both individual cases and questions of policy. Both the Board and its administration are funded by an independent trust. The Board has the authority to decide whether Facebook and Instagram should allow or remove content. These decisions are binding, unless implementing them could violate the law. The Board can also choose to issue recommendations on the company’s content policies.

Case Significance: By overturning Facebook’s decision to remove content intended to raise awareness about breast cancer, the Oversight Board widens the scope of freedom of expression, while protecting access to information, the right to health, and women’s rights to nondiscrimination on an issue of the utmost relevance regarding public health. The Board’s decision also strengthens freedom of expression by recommending that Facebook implement safeguards, such as human review, on automated content moderation. By urging the company to be more transparent about the efficacy of its automated content removal, the Board also fosters a better environment for freedom of expression online.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

According to Article 2 of the Oversight Board Charter, “For each decision, any prior board decisions will have precedential value and should be viewed as highly persuasive when the facts, applicable policies, or other factors are substantially similar.” In addition, Article 4 of the Oversight Board Charter establishes, “The board’s resolution of each case will be binding and Facebook (now Meta) will implement it promptly, unless implementation of a resolution could violate the law. In instances where Facebook identifies that identical content with parallel context – which the board has already decided upon – remains on Facebook (now Meta), it will take action by analyzing whether it is technically and operationally feasible to apply the board’s decision to that content as well. When a decision includes policy guidance or a policy advisory opinion, Facebook (now Meta) will take further action by analyzing the operational procedures required to implement the guidance, considering it in the formal policy development process of Facebook (now Meta), and transparently communicating about actions taken as a result.”

Related Caselaw

Source Name and URL: Columbia Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 14 nov 2024

Documentos primarios

Decision (in English).pdf
English
Descargar Ver

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

Oversight Board Case of Breast Cancer Symptoms and Nudity

Documentos primarios

Notificaciones