Anterior 3 / 47 Próximo

BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT - 1 BvR 16/13 - IM NAMEN DES VOLKES In dem Verfahren über die Verfassungsbeschwerde des Herrn T…, - Bevollmächtigte: gegen …- das Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 13. November 2012 - VI ZR 330/ 11 - hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht - Erster Senat unter Mitwirkung der Richterinnen und Richter Vizepräsident Harbarth, Masing, Paulus, Baer, Britz, Ott, Christ, Radtke am 6. November 2019 beschlossen: 1. Das Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 13. November 2012 - VI ZR 330/11 - verletzt den Beschwerdeführer in seinem Grundrecht aus Artikel 2 Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 1 Absatz 1 des Grundgesetzes. 2. Es wird aufgehoben. Die Sache wird an den Bundesgerichtshof zurückverwiesen. 3/47

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

The Case of Mr T

Case Law

Country

Germany

Country Location

Latitud: 51.168768345617636

Longitud: 10.094236493110516

Country Location (vinculado Case Law): Germany

Decision Date: 6 nov 2019

Case Status: Cerrado

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Reversed and Remanded

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Law or Action Overturned or Deemed Unconstitutional

Keywords

Right to be Forgotten

Judicial Body: Constitutional Court

Court Name: Federal Constitutional Court of Germany

Case Number: 1 BvR 16/13

Case Summary: The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany reversed a Federal Court ruling that an individual convicted of murder did not have the right to have his name removed from online articles about the murder and his trial. The individual had sought to have his name removed from the articles published by a German magazine and the articles themselves removed from general internet search results of his name. The Federal Court had held that the magazine’s right to freedom of expression outweighed the individual’s personality rights. However, the Federal Constitutional Court held that the Federal Court had not given enough weight to the impact of the articles on the individual’s everyday life and had not considered all the options open to the magazine to balance their right to freedom of expression with the individual’s personality rights. The Federal Constitutional Court noted that the Federal Court is the appropriate forum to determine a suitable solution and so remanded the case back to the Federal Court for a final determination.

Case Significance: The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Documentos primarios

The Case of Mr T.pdf
German
Descargar Ver

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

The Case of Mr T

Documentos primarios

Notificaciones