b . Whether Google LLC is a "data user" within the definition of the Ordinance? c . Under this issue whether the criteria of "control requirement" and " processing requirement are necessary conditions for the " application of the Ordinance? The above issue is purely a question of law. d . Whether there is any "control" of the Google data search engine by Google LLC in Hong Kong? e . Whether Google LLC has acted in breach of DPP 2(2) and/or section 26(1) of the Ordinance? f . Whether the "right to be forgotten" is recognized in Hong Kong, and if so the application of the balancing exercise for the right? 32. The other complaints of the Appellant against the Decision of the Respondent such as inaccuracy of the data kept and defamation are not pursued by the Appellant in the appeal. E What Is the Territorial Scone/Jurisdiction of the Ordinance . El. The LRC Report & the OECD Guidelines 33. As stated in the explanatory memorandum to the Personal Data (Privacy) Bill 1995，the Ordinance gives effect to the majority of the 24