Article 32 Court’s ruling as meant in Article 31 verse (3) at least contains stipulations of: a. It does not break the bloodline between a child and his/her biological parents. b. It does not relieve parents from the obligation to finance the child’s living. c. It sets the time-line for revoking (of being a guardian). CHAPTER VII GUARDIANSHIP Article 33 (1) In the event that a child’s parents are not adept in performing a law-related activity, or their whereabouts are unknown, then persons or legal entities that meet the requirements can be appointed as guardians of the child. (1) To become a guardian as meant in verse (1) is conducted through court’s ruling. (2) The appointed guardians as meant in verse (2) must have the same religion with that of the child. (3) For the shake of the child, guardians as meant in verse (2) are obliged to manage the wealth owned by the child. (4) Requirements on conditions and procedures for appointing guardians as meant in verse (1) are regulated further by Government Regulation. Article 34 The guardians appointed based on court’s ruling as in Article 33, can represent a child in alegal action, be it inside or outside the court for the best interest of the child. Article 35 (1) In the event that a child has not attained a court’s ruling on guardians, then the wealth of the child can be managed by Body of Inherited Wealth or other authorized institutions for such matters. (2) Body of Inherited wealth or other institutions as meant in verse (1) acting as a supervising guardian to represent a child’s interest. (3) Wealth management as meant in verse (1) and verse (2) must have a ruling. Article 36 (1) In cases where the appointed guardian is not adept in acting out law-related activities or abuse his/her authority as a guardian, then his/her status of guardian is revoked and another is appointed as a guardian through court’s ruling. (2) In cases where the guardian is deceased, another is appointed as a guardian through court’s ruling. 9