investigated, assuming its validity, as they are all facts that occurred before the aforementioned law was issued, and that in this case the Court should have decided to stop the appellant's prosecution for this charge for this reason. (8) Alternately, as the Public Prosecution’s evidence was devoid of any technical evidence linking any of the aforementioned accounts to the appellant. It was a priority for the Public Prosecution, in the context of its endeavour to prove its claim, to conduct a technical examination to link the mentioned electronic accounts to the appellant. (9) Alternately, His Excellency the judge of the Nablus Magistrate Court, made a mistake in its decision to convict the appellant, due to the absence of any seizures and that the Public Prosecution did not show the aforementioned seizures to the competent court. Showing the investigation file without referring to all the contents by the Public Prosecution on the face of cassation was a mistake committed by the Magistrate Court, which necessitates annulment of the Court’s decision to convict appellant. (10) The request: For all the legal reasons mentioned and others that the esteemed Court deems appropriate, I request the esteemed Court to accept the appeal in form and then in substance, and consider this appeal as a pleading, and as a result, the original criminal case, the subject of this appeal, is dismissed for the invalidity of all arrest and investigation procedures and / or stopping the appellant’s prosecution for the charge of slander against the Palestinian Authority based on the above-mentioned reasons, and alternately announcing his innocence from the third charge, which is slander against the authority due to the absence of any of the elements of the act attributed to the appellant and/or the illegality of the claim. As it was contrary to the Palestinian Basic Law and the international agreements that the Palestinian Authority has joined in ensuring freedom of opinion, expression, and freedom of journalism. The role of the esteemed Court, with respect, is to expand the interpretation of the contents of these freedoms without leaving the matter of their appreciation to be subject to arbitrariness by the Public Prosecution and the institution of the executive authority. Honourable Court, the court's role, with respect, is to supervise the litigation procedures from the moment of arrest until the judgment is issued. This role extends within the framework of the final investigation that the court is carrying out to decide the case before it. The project has granted the judge this authority to ensure respect and implementation of the law. As the judge does not hesitate to protect the proper application of the provisions of the law, just as he is keen to achieve rebuke in the judgments he issues, so he seeks in return not to allow those in charge of applying the law to be arbitrary or deviant while carrying out their work. Also, the case before the court has a political nature, since the appellant's prosecution was the result of his journalistic work and running a critical TV program with political implications. It is worth mentioning that the appellant's prosecution continued even after his release by a decision of Nablus Magistrate Court, where he was arrested by the Israeli occupation forces for a period of 38 days, and he was interrogated about details related to his statements and the investigation that took place with him at the