3 Crl. App. No.01-2019 Apex Court pertains to the appeals being heard by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan; under the Supreme Court Rules and Orders and not under the general law. Learned counsel read through various pronouncements on the issue, in particular, case reported as ‘Hayat Bakhsh and others Vs. The State’ (PLD 1981 Supreme Court 265) to highlight that where the matter is pending before High Court, the same is to be decided in accordance with prevalent law. When enquired, as to on what grounds, instant applications have been filed, learned counsel took the Court through the certificates appended with the application by one Dr. David Lawrence effect that appellant has various to the indispositions and his surgery could not take place due to which, his medical condition got deteriorated and he cannot travel. Learned counsel further submitted that under section 423 Cr.P.C., the appeal can be proceeded and decided on merits. 4. Responding to the arguments by learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Jahanzeb Khan Bharwana, Additional Prosecutor General NAB reiterated his stance that instant applications are not maintainable, as in essence, Crl.Misc. No.229-2020 seeks review of order dated 10.09.2020 and Crl.Misc. No.213-2020 seeks perpetual exemption from appearance. He also highlighted that instant applications are under section 561-A Cr.P.C. which provision is barred under section 9-B of National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999. He further placed reliance on order dated 01.04.2019 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Review Petition No.513 of 2014 as well as case reported as ‘Ikram Ullah and others Vs. The State’ (2015 SCMR 1002), ‘Karam Ellahi Vs.