USCA Case #14-5004
Document #1570210
Filed: 08/28/2015
SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I will
not restate either the facts or the background law, as I fully
agree with my colleagues’ statements on those subjects.
Indeed, I agree with virtually everything in Judge Williams’
opinion, save for its conclusion, and I even agree with part of
that. My colleagues believe that the preliminary injunction
entered by the district court must be vacated, as plaintiffs have
failed to establish a “substantial likelihood of success on the
merits.” Brown Op. 1; Williams Op. 3. I agree. However,
my colleagues also believe that the case should be remanded
for further proceedings. I do not agree. Like Judge Williams,
I believe that the failure to establish the likelihood of success
depends at least in the first instance on plaintiffs’ inability to
establish the jurisdiction of the court. I also agree with Judge
Williams that plaintiffs have not established the jurisdiction of
the court. That being the case, I would not remand the case
for further proceedings, but would direct its dismissal.
As my colleagues recognize, in order to bring a cause
within the jurisdiction of the court, the plaintiffs must
demonstrate, inter alia, that they have standing. “[T]o show
standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate an ‘injury in fact’ that is
‘actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.’”
Williams Op. at 1 (quoting Friends of the Earth, Inc. v.
Laidlaw Envt’l Servs. (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 180 (2000).
As Judge Williams goes on to note, “[p]laintiffs claim to
suffer injury from government collection of records from their
telecommunications provider relating to their calls.” Id. at 1;
see also Brown Op. 2. However, plaintiffs never in any
fashion demonstrate that the government is or has been
collecting such records from their telecommunications
provider, nor that it will do so. Briefly put, and discussed in
more detail by Judge Williams, plaintiffs’ theory is that
because it is a big collection and they use a big carrier, the
government must be getting at their records. While this may
be a better-than-usual conjecture, it is nonetheless no more
Page 19 of 21
Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3
Se connecter à un paragraphe
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Ajouter à la table des matières