19 Mat Exhibit 8/9 – Signature of L. Nato Singh in mat exhibit 8/8. After closure of the prosecution evidence accused person was examined u/s 313 Cr. PC. As no defence witnesses were adduced the case was heard in argument as placed by both sides. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION a) Whether the prosecution has been able to prove the offence u/s 354A/354C/354D/509 of IPC and sections 66E/66C/67/67A IT Act 2000 (Amendment 2008) against the accused person beyond the shadow of all reasonable doubts? DECISION WITH REASONS Having heard both sides and after perusal of the materials on record it appears that P.W. 1 is the defacto complainant in this case. Now let us scan the evidences from the case record. P.W. 1 has testified before this court and stated her father’s name along with the nick name (name of the victim’s father is not disclosed in this judgment) and stated that she knows Ani Boxi @ Animesh Bokshi @ Animesh Boxi and had got friendly relationship with the accused for three years ago and then had got close relationship for many days but at present she had no relationship with him and as they came close to each other so the accused demanded from her some personal photos of her and she did not agree to give him any pictures but then the accused used to tell her sentimental words and used to show her annoyance and as she used to love him and believed him and so she gave the accused personal moments pictures and then the accused used to tell her to go for outing with him but she did not agree to this and as she did not go for outing with him so the accused told him that he would publish her personal private photos in the social media and then P.W. 1 realised that the guy was not good and was blackmailing her and creating pressure upon her. P.W. 1 further stated that she took some nude pictures and video of her in her mobile phone as the accused told her to do so and as the accused wanted to see it and demanded it from her and as she used to love the accused and believed him very much and had not given those nude pictures and video of her to the accused and when she had got good relationship with him then the accused used to see her mobile phone and she had got her password written in her diary and he took her password from her diary and opened her phone and took away her nude pictures and videos from the “chip” of her mobile