26
lady refused to go to Digha and so, in anger he took some nude
pictures and video of the lady and uploaded it into the porn website.
P.W. 6 further stated that the name of the person who narrated the
incident was Animesh Chaki and he was present before the court who
then showed that pictures and video and the CID officer downloaded
those and then the officer burnt those pictures and video in a DVD
and told Sukanta and him to sign on the DVD and seizure list. P.W. 6
identified the seizure list containing two pages and after reading and
understanding its content signed into the seizure list along with dates
(exhibits 18 and 18/1) and also stated that he knew the signature and
handwriting of Sukanta who had signed in both the pages along with
date in his presence and identified it (exhibits 18/2 and 18/3). P.W. 6
identified his signature and date (mat exhibit 2) in the DVD (which the
I.O. of this case marked as exhibit E before sending to C.F.S.L.,
Kolkata) and P.W. 6 also identified the signature (mat exhibit 2/1) of
Sukanta Roy in the DVD and P.W. 6 also stated that one print out of
Disclosure Memo containing two pages was also taken and he had
signed in both the pages along with date (exhibits 19 and 19/1) and
Sukanta Roy also signed into it in his presence and he knew the
signature and handwriting of Sukanta Roy and identified it (exhibits
19/2 and 19/3).
P.W. 7 is the O/C, POWC Cell posted at CID, West Bengal who
stated that she could remember the incident of 07/8/17 and on that
day Additional O/C, Cyber Cell, Atanu Santra (P.W. 18) called her in his
cell and when she went there then Atanu Santra gave her a
requisition in connection with Panskura P.S. case no. 381 of 2017 and
identified that requisition and also the signature along with date
(exhibit 20) in it and P.W. 7 stated that after receiving it she had
consulted with her superior for taking permission and had got verbal
permission to assist in connection with Panskura P.S. case no. 381 of
2017. P.W. 7 further stated that she saw in the office of Atanu Santra,
a girl and her father and Atanu Santra then informed her that the
name of the girl is (victim’s name not disclosed) who is the
complainant of Panskura P.S. case no. 381 of 2017 and her father
whose name is (victim’s father name not disclosed) and in her
presence victim gave her Samsung mobile and two sim cards to
Atanu Santra (P.W. 18) who then seized those articles in her presence
and she had signed on the seizure list as witness. P.W. 7 identified the
Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3
Se connecter à un paragraphe
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Ajouter à la table des matières