03/02/2020 G.R. No. 204894 2 TSN, February 8, 2007, pp. 4-7. 3 TSN, May 3, 2007, pp. 10-14. 4 CA rollo, p. 28. 5 Records, pp. 431-438. 6 TSN, December 14, 2006, pp. 4-7. 7 Rollo, p. 6. 8 Id. at 27-34. 9 Id. at 2-17. 10 Id. at 18. 11 Bacolod v. People, G.R. No. 206236, July 15, 2013. 12 People v. Garcia, 577 Phil. 483, 500 (2008). 13 CA rollo, pp. 32-33. 14 See People v. Candado, 174 Phil. 12, 27-28 (1978). 15 A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC, Re: Expansion of the Coverage of the Rules on Electronic Evidence, September 24, 2002. Rule 1, Sec. 2. Cases covered. – These Rules shall apply to the criminal and civil actions and proceeding, as well as quasi-judicial and administrative cases. 16 Id., Rule 11, Section 2: Section 2. Ephemeral electronic communications. – Ephemeral electronic communications shall be proven by the testimony of a person who was a party to the same or has personal knowledge thereof. In the absence or unavailability of such witnesses, other competent evidence may be admitted. 17 RULES OF COURT, Rule 113, Section 5(b). 18 People v. Relos, Sr., G.R. No. 189326, November 24, 2010, 636 SCRA 258, 264-265. The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/mar2014/gr_204894_2014.html 3/3