Case 1:14-cv-09763-VM Document 44 Filed 08/28/15 Page 18 of 35 with some basis disclosure and to assure risk itself of harm that is the link between substantial. The Government's justifications might constitute "good" reasons if the information contained in the Attachment that is still redacted were not, at least in substance even if not in the precise form, already disclosed by government divisions and agencies, and thus known to the public. Here, publicly-available government documents provide substantially similar information as that set forth in the Attactunent. that it For matters that reason, that the these Court other is not documents persuaded were not disclosed by the FBI itself rather than by other government agencies, and that they would hold iignificant weight for a potential target of a national security investigation in ascertaining whether the FBI would gather such information through an NSL. The documents referred to were prepared and published FBI' s by various government authority to issue NSLs, divisions discussing the the types of materials the FBI seeks, and how to draft NSL requests. Indeed, one of these documents is a publicly-available Department of Justice Office of Legal Education manual that provides a sample attactunent that encapsulates much of the redacted-information in the Attachment here in dispute. The - 18 -