never charged with either rape or sexual assault. Indeed, he has been exonerated of any involvement with such offences. 9. The claimant began these proceedings by issuing a claim form on 14th August 2013 in the High Court. The first defendant was the Leicestershire Police, the second defendant was the university, the third defendant was the Loughborough Student’s Union. 10. The Particulars of Claim alleged against the second defendant, the university, a claim under the Data Protection Act 1998 and also the claim in contract. Specifically the claimant alleged that the disclosure of his personal details and photographs to the police on 3rd May 2010, without his consent, had been either contrary to the 1998 Act or a breach of contract. 11. As I have said, on 24th June 2010 Master Yoxall granted the university summary judgment and dismissed the claim against it. Master Yoxall also granted summary judgment in favour of the third defendant. He rejected a like application by the first defendants, the Leicestershire Police. 12. The claimant applied for permission to appeal Master Yoxall’s order. The application was refused by Globe J first, on 30th October 2014. Globe J said the application was wholly without merit, which meant, pursuant to CPR Rule 52.3(4a) the claimant had no right to renew his application orally. Nevertheless, the claimant sought to rely on further documentation, which he set out in his letter to the court of 27th January 2015. He was trying to persuade Globe J to reconsider his decision. 13. By an order dated 6th February 2015, Globe J reiterated that permission was refused. The application was still considered to be wholly without merit. 14. The claimant tried yet again in an email of 12th February 2015, but Globe J directed that the matter was concluded and no further correspondence from the claimant would be answered or acknowledged. 15. The claim against the Leicestershire Police has continued. At a case management conference on 27th March 2015, Master Yoxall ordered it to be transferred to the Central London County Court. 16. On 3rd June 2015, DC Fell made a witness statement in which he records his dealings with the university. Paragraph 20 of his witness statement said this: “I obtained information from the university regarding Mr Bangura by way of a Data Protection Act request. I had a working understanding with the head of security (that is Mr Kennedy) and he would sometimes give me information straightaway, knowing that a DPA form would be provided subsequently. This occurred when he knew we were investigating a crime, as here.” 17. On 14th September 2015, Mr Recorder Marsden, sitting at the Central London County Court, directed that the police should file a further witness statement which set out the