Précédent 2 / 22 Next

for Freedom of the Press, amicus curiae. Neal Kumar Katyal, Sean Marotta, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Christopher T. Handman, and Dominic F. Perella on brief for Snapchat, Inc., amicus curiae. September 28, 2016

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

● ● ●

Rideout v. Gardner

Case Law

Country

United States

Country Location

Latitude: 39.778231903243785

Longitude: -100.8801256788983

Country Location (Lié Case Law): United States

Decision Date: 11 août 2015

Case Status: Affaire Résolue

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Affirmed Lower Court
Appeal allowed
Motion Denied

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Law or Action Overturned or Deemed Unconstitutional

Keywords

Censorship
Political Expression

Judicial Body: Appellate Court

Case Number: 14-cv-489-PB

Case Summary: New Hampshire passed a law that makes it unlawful for voters to take and disclose photos of their voting ballots to show others how they have voted. Three voters investigated under this law challenged it on First Amendment grounds. The court ruled that the new law is a content-based restriction on speech that cannot survive the standard of strict scrutiny.

Case Significance: The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Source Name and URL: Columbia Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

CIPIT

Date Updated: 10 mai 2024

Documents principaux

Rideout v. Gardner.pdf
English
Télécharger Vue

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

Rideout v. Gardner

Documents principaux

Notifications