Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806 websites without any consent or permission. They have extreme technological limitations and adverse repercussions, especially on the exercise of free speech. As they cannot effectively distinguish between content and they operate in an “all or nothing” framework, there exists the possibility that they may end up jeopardizing and removing legitimate and genuine content. h. Unlike CSAM which is patently and universally illegal, NCII content is dependent on the context in which it has been taken or shared. Despite Google’s best efforts to prevent the content from reappearing, many such content can be easily modified and thus, evades detection. The index that is cultivated by the search engines is only a “keyword on the page” + URL. The computer cannot qualitatively review this information to decide whether this pertains to the concerned subject or not. Any mandate to review such content will devastate the efficacy of platforms and cripple delivery of services online. There is also no obligation under law to put any filters qua search engines. i. Reporting mechanisms qua Google Search have been provided by way of an Affidavit and the same has been reproduced as under: ―30. I say that the support pages and reporting mechanisms qua Google Search are briefly encapsulated hereinbelow, for ready reference of this Hon'ble Court: Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR Signing Date:26.04.2023 17:19:50 W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 Page 52 of 88