Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806
paying lakhs of money to Mr. Singhal, along with handing him
all her jewellery.
d)
It is stated that as the funds of the Petitioner had depleted and
she was unable to pay any more money to Mr. Singhal, he
followed through on his threats and leaked the Petitioner’s
explicit images on various pornographic websites without the
consent or permission of the Petitioner. This led to the
Petitioner addressing a complaint dated 03.08.2021 against Mr.
Singhal to the SHO at Police Station Lajpat Nagar recording the
new offences. The said complaint notes that Mr. Singhal had
made a YouTube channel in the Petitioner’s name, and has
been posting her explicit videos and photographs on a daily
basis.
e)
Despite the Petitioner having approached the Grievance Cells
of Respondents No. 3 to 6, i.e. Google LLC, Microsoft India
Pvt. Ltd. (later replaced by Microsoft Ireland Operations Ltd.
which is the entity managing its search engine, Bing),
YouTube.com and Vimeo.com, as well as having placed
multiple complaints on cybercrime.gov.in, the explicit images
of the Petitioner were not taken down.
f)
Aggrieved by the failure in the redressal processes available to
her, the Petitioner herein has approached this Court by way of
the instant writ petition for directions to the Respondents for
removal of all her non-consensual intimate images on the
internet.
4.
During the course of hearing of the instant writ petition, vide Order
dated 11.08.2021, Respondent No.5 was deleted from the array of parties,
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR
Signing Date:26.04.2023
17:19:50
W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021
Page 4 of 88
Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3
Se connecter à un paragraphe
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Ajouter à la table des matières