21 signature on the label of the envelope (mat exhibit 1/1). P.W. 1 further stated that she was examined by one woman police namely Kakali mam and she had damaged the chip as because her pictures were available in the social media and she was not mentally well and she was afraid, so she could not give the chip to the police. P.W. 1 further stated that for the purpose of investigation she gave consent to the Photography Cell, CID, West Bengal by writing and also identified it (exhibit 5), identified seven pages containing the printed screen shots of her nude personal photos and identified the printed screen shots containing three pages (exhibits 1/4, 1/5 and 1/6) of her nude pictures which she had downloaded from pornhub and later on taken screen shots in her laptop and taken print out of the same and had submitted to the P.S. along with her written complaint and had signed on each and every pages of three pages along with date 21/7/17 and stated that the name of Anibokshi profile is showing in page numbers 2 and 3 but it is not showing in page number 1. P.W. 1 also stated that she had submitted a certificate which she had given to the P.S. on 01/9/17 along with her statement and it bears her signature (exhibit 1/3) to prove the authenticity of the three screen shots (exhibits 1/4, 1/5 and 1/6) and she had put her signature after reading it. P.W. 1 further stated in her examination -in- chief that the link in the website pornhub is still available and anyone could see it live and it has not yet been deleted and it could be seen by searching the term (victim’s name) and if court gave her the opportunity then she could show it before the court today that the link containing her video is still available with her name and her father’s name and that her personal nude photos are spreading every where in this world and it is now impossible for her to live in this world. After Ld. Special PP made arrangement for internet access in the court room through mobile phone wifi hotspot and as the Ld. Lawyer for the accused raised no objection the website pornhub is opened which contained the link of the video and P.W. 1 stated that this was her video with her name and her father’s name. P.W. 2 is the father of the defacto complainant (P.W. 1) who testified before this court that the victim is her daughter and while his daughter was studying in the college then there was love affairs in between her daughter and Animesh Boxi and due to this love affair the accused had stolen some nude pictures of her daughter from her