由此 - 13 - A B 42. At trial Mr. Remedios called no evidence to justify either the thrust of the Article or the meanings pleaded in the SOC. Therefore, no C A B C evidence having been adduced to justify the truth of the general thrust or D the specific meanings, I can presume the same to be untrue. E E 43. F It follows that, subject to any defence of qualified privilege, ATOL must be liable to the Plaintiffs in defamation. 44. I F G G H D I now proceed to examine the Article in closer detail to amplify my conclusion. The Article has 28 paragraphs which I have divided into 13 sections as follows:(1) Section I: H I §1. J J (2) Section II: §§2-3. (3) Section III: §§4-5. L (4) Section IV: §§6-8. M (5) Section V: §§9-11. M N (6) Section VI: §12-15. N (7) Section VII: §16. (8) Section VIII: §17. K K O O P P (9) Q L Section IX: §§18-20. Q (10) Section X: §§21-22. R (11) Section XI: §23. R S (12) Section XII: §§24-27. S (13) Section XIII: §28. T T U U V V