- 4 A B A 7. As to the summons to continue the injunction order, L Chan J B ordered that the injunction order do continue until the disposal of the C D E F summons or until further order. He adjourned the summons for argument to a date to be fixed and also gave directions for the filing of evidence. 8. As to the summons for the continuation of the Mareva order, L Chan J ordered that the Mareva order be continued until judgment or C D E F further order. G H G 9. On 22 January 2016 the 1st, 2nd, 5th and 6th defendants issued a H summons for an order that the injunction order and the Mareva order be set I J aside on the grounds set out in the summons (“the discharge summons”). The discharge summons was returnable on 19 February 2016 but was I J estimated by the solicitors for those defendants to last for only 15 minutes. K L K 10. The summons for the continuation of the injunction order and L the discharge summons came before Mr Recorder Whitehead SC on M N 19 February 2016. At that hearing the Recorder ordered that the summons for the continuation of the injunction order and the discharge M N summons be adjourned with an early return date to be fixed for one and a O O half days. P P 11. Q R The Recorder also gave directions for the filing of further evidence. He also gave leave to the plaintiffs to amend the Appendix 1 to the order of L Chan J dated 18 December 2015 by the deletion of five Q R items namely, item 69 and items 75 to 78. S S T T U U V V