present appeal. Irrespective of the outcome of this appeal, the Appellant does have a genuine concern and a legitimate purpose to serve to protect his private personal data. It will be an irony and will frustrate the said legitimate purpose of the Appellant if in course, of this appeal the hearing of which is open to the public and the Decision also to be published to the public if the very information the Appellant seeks to protect were to be made public. In the eye of justice, the Appellant does have a valid ground in his application. 24. Furthermore, the issues in the present appeal are matters of legal matters, construction of the relevant Ordinance which do not relate to the Appellant's identity or his posts in the oficial body. The public nor the Respondent and Google LLC simply do not have interest in the context of the appeal to have regard to the above information. In the premises, while the granting of the order sought by the Appellant is important to him, the concealing of such information will have no adverse effect on the integrity of the present Decision of any party or the public. 25. For the above reasons, the Board grants the anonymity order applied by the Appellant and he is only referred to as "X" in this Decision. C Grounds of Appeal and Submissions . 26. In respect of the substantive appeal, the Appellant filed his grounds of appeal in July 2019. 27. The Respondent filed a statement dated 11 September 2019. 22