28. Google LLC filed its written submissions dated 3 October 2019. 29. The Appellant filed a statement of response dated October 2019 (without a specific date) to reply to the statement of the Respondent and the written submissions of Google LLC. 30. The Board has considered the grounds of appeal which at the hearing condescend to the issues set out hereinbelow, all the written submissions of the Parties and the oral submissions they made at the appeal hearing. The Board does not propose to set out all the submissions and arguments on the issues raised in detail. At the hearing upon the request of the Board , Counsel for Google LLC prepared a summary of the positions/stances of the parties in relation to the main issues of the appeal ("the Summary"), to which the Respondent agrees and the Appellant only wants to add some references of his case. Attached herewith the Summary with the Appellant's added references in red. With the assistance of the Summary it suffices for the Board to set out, in the course of analysis and reasons of the Board herein, the more relevant and important submissions of the parties. D Issues . 31. Having considered the grounds of appeal and the respective submissions of the parties, as agreed by the parties and set out in the Summary, the following main issues fall to be resolved by the Board: a . What is the territorial scope of the Ordinance? This is purely a question of law. 23