CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- مكتبة
- تسجيل الدخول

مرتبة حسب

تم إضافة التاريخ

73 العلاقات, 63 الكيانات

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3

● ● ●

أوازي من إعداد:
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
مكتبة
تسجيل الدخول

معلومات
73العلاقات

Google LLC v. National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL)

Case Law

نصائح البحث

بحث النص

Type something in the search box to get some results.

جدول المحتويات

لا يوجد جدول المحتويات

لا جدول محتويات الوصف

Google LLC v. National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL)

Case Law

Country

France

Country Location

خط العرض: 46.808568018841505

خط الطول: 2.799314618110868

Country Location (مرتبط Case Law): France

Decision Date: 24 سبتمبر 2019

Case Status: أُغلقت / إنتهت

Case Outcome Procedural

Admissible

Case Outcome (Disposition)

فتوى / حكم أولي

Keywords

Data Protection
Privacy
Right to be forgotten
Search Engines

Judicial Body: محكمة العدل الأوروبية

Court Name: Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Case Number: C‑507/17

Case Summary: The Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union held that existing EU law did not oblige Google to carry out an order to de-reference search results on all versions of its search engine. The case originated in France after the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) fined Google LLC for failing to globally de-reference information concerning a data subject. The Court explained that EU law establishing and regulating the right to be de-referenced (right to be forgotten) was silent about the geographic scope of de-referencing orders. The Court held that in principle the de-referencing was supposed to be carried out in respect of all the Member States, but since privacy protections were not reconciled across the EU, it was up to courts and other relevant bodies in each Member State to decide the breadth of the de-referencing. The Court did not rule that Google could never be obliged to carry out a de-referencing order globally, but it was up to a court to decide when this was appropriate.

Case Significance: The judgment is positive for freedom of expression since it makes it less onerous for search engine operators to comply with “a right to be forgotten” obligations. However, the judgment contracts the right to privacy since, in this globalised internet environment, the access by internet users located outside the EU to the de-referenced links in question is likely to defeat the purpose of giving the person involved a reputational ‘blank slate.’

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

Since the judgment came in light of a request for a Preliminary Ruling by the Council of State (France), the CJEU remanded the matter back to the national court to adjudicate the case on merits. However, as a decision of the Grand Chamber of the CJEU, the judgment has high precedential value.

Related Caselaw

Big Brother Watch v. The United Kingdom
Delfi AS v. Estonia
Google LLC v. National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL)
Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Hurbain v. Belgium
Kablis v. Russia
NT1 and NT2 v. Google LLC
Savva Terentyev v. Russia

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 يوليو 2024

المستندات الأولية

Judgment - Grand Chamber
Somali
تحميل عرض

ملفات الدعم

Written Observations of Article 19 And Others592.06 kB

لا مرجع

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country1
- Country1
Precedent68
- Case Law68
لا تسمية4
- Case Law3
- Secondary Source1

Create Reference

اختر نوع العلاقة

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

نصائح البحث

إضافة كيانات (أو إدخالات)/ مستندات

نصائح البحث

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.