11 WP No.11759/2020 arguments, t he Petitioner’s counsel specifically brought to the notice of the Special Court that the Petitioner is not consenting for Polygraph test and the order for Polygraph test dated 23-09-2020 was passed without hearing him, it amounts to testimonial compulsion as held by th e Hon’b1e Supreme court in the case of Selvi V/ s State of Karnataka reported in 2010 (7) SCC 263, it interferes in his right to privacy which is guaranteed as Fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution as held in th e Puttaswamy case of Mr. Ju s t ic e V/ s Union of K.S. India reported in 2017(10) SCC Page.1. 2.16. The Special Court, however, by its order dated 15-10-2020, rejected the recall application holding that the Court can order