emphasize that freedom of speech, while a fundamental right, does not grant individuals the license to inflict harm or tarnish the reputation of others. This distinction becomes particularly pertinent when grappling with the court’s dilemma of striking a balance between the cherished value of free expression and the equally essential need to protect an individual's reputation. 46. Thus, a Court, while weighing the value of reputation of one party and freedom of expression of the other, has to keep in mind that in a democratic setup, a person who is complainant in such cases may be vulnerable in a given set of circumstances in face of his competing interest with that of the accused. The principle of equal protection under the law mandates that the courts consider the plight of every individual, regardless of their societal status. In rendering equal protection, the court must balance the right of free speech with the need to prevent unjust harm to reputation. The injurious falsehood of a statement will definitely invite defamation and loss of reputation. 47. Whether a person has achieved great heights in society, or finds himself marginalised considering himself as the last and least in terms of access to Court of law to fight for safeguarding his reputation, their right to fair treatment and protection from unwarranted harm remains paramount before any Court of law while adjudicating. This approach and duty becomes more critical when the complainant may be pitted against a person who may have more power, influence and followers. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:05.02.2024 16:25:50 CRL.M.C. 6347/2019 Page 32 of 50