sufficient legal basis for the creation of the Electronic and Postal Communications (Online Content) Regulations, 2018? As is clear from my discussion of the law and my analysis of the rival arguments of the disputing parties herein, I am settled in my view that section 103 (1) of the Act provides sufficient basis for the creation of the Regulations except in the context I have explained above. The next question would then be: In promulgating the Regulations, has the 1st respondent acted, in the words of the applicants, “in excess of powers, illegally, against the principles of natural justice, unreasonably, arbitrarily and ambiguously”? My answer to this question is in the negative— the only exception being in respect of the definition of the word “content” in the Regulations, where I find the 1st respondent to have exceeded his powers in defining that word in a way that is in conflict with the definition provided by the parent Act. Having said that, certiorari is granted by quashing the definition of the word content in the Regulations. Save for the aforesaid, the application is dismissed, with an order that each party to bear its own costs. Order accordingly. Dated and delivered at Mtwara this 9^\iay of January, 2019. I ' W.P. DYANSOBERA // JUDGE 25