276 CROOKES  v. NEWTON [2011] 3 S.C.R. Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 8th ed. Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006. Lindsay, David. Liability for the Publication of Defama‑ tory Material via the Internet, Research Paper No. 10. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Centre for Media, Communications and Information Technology Law, 2000. Osborne, Philip H. The Law of Torts, 4th ed. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2011. Ross, June. “The Common Law of Defamation Fails to Enter the Age of the Charter” (1996), 35 Alta. L. Rev. 117. Sableman, Mark. “Link Law Revisited: Internet Linking Law at Five Years” (2001), 16 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1273. Streeter, Jeremy. “The ‘Deception Exception’: A New Approach to Section 2(b) Values and Its Impact on Defamation Law” (2003), 61 U.T. Fac. L. Rev. 79. Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett. « Silencing John Doe : Defamation & Discourse in Cyberspace » (2000), 49 Duke L.J. 855. Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 8th ed. Markham, Ont. : LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006. Lindsay, David. Liability for the Publication of Defama‑ tory Material via the Internet, Research Paper No. 10. Melbourne : University of Melbourne, Centre for Media, Communications and Information Technology Law, 2000. Osborne, Philip H. The Law of Torts, 4th ed. Toronto : Irwin Law, 2011. Ross, June. « The Common Law of Defamation Fails to Enter the Age of the Charter » (1996), 35 Alta. L. Rev. 117. Sableman, Mark. « Link Law Revisited : Internet Linking Law at Five Years » (2001), 16 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1273. Streeter, Jeremy. « The “Deception Exception” : A New Approach to Section 2(b) Values and Its Impact on Defamation Law » (2003), 61 U.T. Fac. L. Rev. 79. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (Prowse, Saunders and Bauman JJ.A.), 2009 BCCA 392, 96 B.C.L.R. (4th) 315, 311 D.L.R. (4th) 647, 276 B.C.A.C. 105, 468 W.A.C. 105, 69 C.C.L.T. (3d) 66, [2010] 2 W.W.R. 271, [2009] B.C.J. No. 1832 (QL), 2009 CarswellBC 2401, affirming a decision of Kelleher J., 2008 BCSC 1424, 88 B.C.L.R. (4th) 395, 61 C.C.L.T. (3d) 148, [2009] 1 W.W.R. 482, [2008] B.C.J. No. 2012 (QL), 2008 CarswellBC 2237. Appeal dismissed. POURVOI contre un arrêt de la Cour d’appel de la Colombie-Britannique (les juges Prowse, Saunders et Bauman), 2009 BCCA 392, 96 B.C.L.R. (4th) 315, 311 D.L.R. (4th) 647, 276 B.C.A.C. 105, 468 W.A.C. 105, 69 C.C.L.T. (3d) 66, [2010] 2 W.W.R. 271, [2009] B.C.J. No. 1832 (QL), 2009 CarswellBC 2401, qui a confirmé une décision du juge Kelleher, 2008 BCSC 1424, 88 B.C.L.R. (4th) 395, 61 C.C.L.T. (3d) 148, [2009] 1 W.W.R. 482, [2008] B.C.J. No. 2012 (QL), 2008 CarswellBC 2237. Pourvoi rejeté. Donald J. Jordan, Q.C., and Robert A. Kasting, for the appellants. Donald J. Jordan, c.r., et Robert A. Kasting, pour les appelants. Daniel W. Burnett and Harvey S. Delaney, for the respondent. Daniel W. Burnett et Harvey S. Delaney, pour l’intimé. Wendy Matheson, Andrew Bernstein and Molly Reynolds, for the intervener the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. Wendy Matheson, Andrew Bernstein et Molly Reynolds, pour l’intervenante l’Association canadienne des libertés civiles. Richard G. Dearden and Wendy J. Wagner, for the intervener the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. Richard G. Dearden et Wendy J. Wagner, pour l’intervenante la Clinique d’intérêt public et de politique d’internet du Canada Samuelson-Glushko. William C. McDowell, Marguerite F. Ethier and Naomi D. Loewith, for the intervener NetCoalition. William C. McDowell, Marguerite F. Ethier et Naomi D. Loewith, pour l’intervenante NetCoalition.