- 13 A B A that P1 was asserting that copyright subsisted not only in the design B drawings but also in the prototypes from which P1’s jewellery products are C C made. D D 54. E F Mr Hughes also submitted, relying on George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1976] AC 64 at pp 90 – 91, that works of artistic craftsmanship must not only be works created using E F craftsmanship, implying special training , skill and knowledge for their G H I J production, but the craftsmanship, not the work itself, must in addition be artistic. 55. G H I would observe that para 8 of the ASC pleads that the works of artistic craftsmanship were each made through the exercise of independent I J and substantial skill, labour and judgment and craftsmanship of the persons K K particularized therein. L L 56. M N O P Despite the submissions of Mr Hughes, it seems to me that there is a serious question to be tried as to subsistence and ownership of copyright. 57. M N I am satisfied on the evidence that there is a serious question to be tried as to subsistence and ownership of copyright in respect of all the O P copyright works relied on. Q R Q 58. It is clear on the evidence that GLAMULET is an online R business that sells promotes and supplies charms and beads and other S T jewellery products worldwide, including Hong Kong. As set out in Elms’ 1st affidavit it operates through a large network of domain names and S T Glamulet websites including www.glamulet.com and www.glamulet.hk U U V V

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents