2 WPA (P) 104 of 2022 Challenging the above order learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on account of this order bank to bank payments, online clearance and other business activities through internet and even online teaching classes are affected and that though no clear reason has been mentioned in the order but apparently the impugned order has been issued to control cheating in the Madhyamik Examination, therefore, it does not satisfy the submitted test that of if proportionality. the State He authorities has further apprehend cheating in the examination through WhatsApp and other means then they can prohibit use of mobile phones in the examination centres, put jammers, increase vigilance, enhance security etc., but they cannot be permitted to suspend internet service infringing the constitutional right of general public. He has also submitted that the reason assigned in the impugned order is vague, it does not satisfy the requirement of Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act and that the impugned order is without jurisdiction. In support of his submission he has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Anuradha Bhasin vs. Union of India and others reported in (2020) 3 SCC 637 and in the matter of Secretary and Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall vs. Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity reported in (2010) 3 SCC 732 and in the matter of People’s Union