B. Recognizing publicity on the grounds that there is a possibility to be propagated
corresponds to analogical interpretation which is prohibited by the principle of legality
as extensive interpretation unfavorable to the criminal defendant beyond the ordinary
acceptation of the text and language.
The interpretation of the text and language is the starting point for the interpretation
of the statute. Expanding the scope of punishment through analogy beyond the
possible meaning of the text and language is not allowed with respect to the
construction of criminal laws and ordinances. Thus, the meaning of the text and
language ought to have priority when construing criminal laws and ordinances.
The Criminal Act of the Republic of Korea has a distinctive characteristic in that it
regulates “publicity” and “alleging facts” as basic requirements for criminal defamation
(Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act). A person who defames another by publicly alleging
false facts shall be punished by heavier statutory punishment than a person who
defames another by publicly alleging facts (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act). As such,
the scope in which criminal defamation is constituted is fairly extended – rarely in
modern civilized countries – by viewing that criminal defamation can be constituted
even if “facts” are revealed as they are, while intimidation through criminal defamation
by alleging fact against the freedom of expression is mitigated by limiting the
constitution of criminal defamation merely to when the requirements for publicity are
satisfied
The legislative purpose which regulates publicity as a constituent element of criminal
defamation lies in punishing only when facts are revealed “socially” and “publicly”
beyond private conversations or conveyance of information among acts of
depreciating personal value assessment. Punishing only those cases where facts that
may infringe another person’s reputation is disseminated in society can be deemed as
a legislative prerogative, which narrows the scope in which criminal defamation may
be constituted, thereby performing a function that guarantees the freedom of
expression as widely as possible under the Constitution of the Republic of Korea.
The term “publicly” lexically means “sufficiently transparent for the whole world to
recognize the speaker.” According to Article 307 of the Criminal Act, “publicly,” as a
requirement for limiting the modality of an act of alleging facts or false facts, means
that an act of committing a crime per se ought to be done so publicly, and it is
contextually obvious that an act of committing a crime which is not done publicly is not
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents