21 COUNTRY India COURT CASE NAME OUTCOME , Rajasthan High , Dhirendra Singh Rajpurohit v The petition was held to be , Court , State of Rajasthan infructuous, as an order had been passed by the Special Secretary, Home (Disaster Management) Department, during the pendency of the case, directing that no order suspending internet services be issued in the future during competitive exams. Beceem eee India ee eee ee ee eee ee ee teat ee ee te ee ee Eee eee eEE ee ee EEE ee EEE EE EEE SEH EE EDEE EE EEE SEH EES EEE EE EEESEH EE EEHEEE EEE DEH EE DEH EE EEE : Karnataka High Court EE EEE eEH eee Eeeeeeg : Gaurav Sureshbhai Vyas The Court referenced its order of : Vv State of Gujarat 17th December, 2019 wherein it has recommended the state to consider inputs from various sources and consider the restoration of internet services during the afternoon, post 3 pm. It also mandated the respondent to place on record any material on the basis of which they require continued restrictions beyond these. In passing this order, the court noted that the respondent state had failed to provide any material to the effect of justifying continued suspension of internet services. As a result, as an interim measure, the court directed the state to restore all internet services from 5 pm that very day. It also observed that the state may take necessary steps to prevent the dissemination of incendiary material that may be disseminated on the internet.