J24 argument that for that those reason who alone deliberately precluded the constitutional guarantee I must state that the judgment from cannot growing be of Mulenga, overstatement, democracies expression and constitutional to long claim an of the press. democratic and in is committed claiming my J.S.C, went of freedom the right ideas and information As the Supreme view, that to upholding practices, of down very well Zambia, like most the right to freedom the constitutional and much lay too not may country However, practices. of that inter alia, the rights under the Bill of Rights, and especially, in this opinions to hold without Court benefit case, as it did with me also. must be the raison de’tre to spur us to entrenching, case, the are At only 50 years of post independence entrenched and freedoms guaranteed falsehoods of free speech.” with the other learned justices in the OBBO It publish and to receive and impart interference. observed in the case Canadian of ZUNDEL, the danger of applying Section 67 in the present form is that the prohibition against publishing prosecuted, false news affects those only not of the fear that they will be caught. This is compounded by the perception that falsity is defined by the majority, speech. and but also those who may refrain from saying what they would like to because minority caught groups or individuals from laying out their hence excluding beliefs by way of Section 67 makes possible conviction for virtually any statement