Rodriguez v. Google LLC 20-cv-04688-RS (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2024) damages model does, in fact, account for classwide attitudes and Google's class-wide alleged wrongdoing. V. CONCLUSION 24 For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs' motion to grant class certification is granted, and Google's motion to exclude the opinion of Plaintiffs' damages expert is denied. The following classes are certified: *24 Class 1: All individuals who, during the period beginning July 1, 2016 and continuing through the present (the “Class Period”), (a) had their “Web & App Activity” and/or “supplemental Web & App Activity” setting turned off and (b) whose activity on a non-Google-branded mobile app was still transmitted to Google, from (c) a mobile device running the Android operating system, because of the Firebase Software Development Kit (“SDK”) and/or Google Mobile Ads SDK. Class 2: All individuals who, during the Class Period (a) had their “Web & App Activity” and/or “supplemental Web & App Activity” setting turned off and (b) whose activity on a non-Google-branded mobile app was still transmitted to Google, from (c) a mobile device running a nonAndroid operating system, because of the Firebase SDK and/or Google Mobile Ads SDK. The parties will appear for a Case Management Conference on February 1, 2024 and submit a Joint Case Management Statement by January 25, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. 15