16 WP No.11759/2020 3.7. The contention of the Petitioner that the mobile phone contains his personal information which is protected under Right to Privacy cannot be accepted, the order of the Trial Court directing the Petitioner to cooperate in unlocking the mobile phone does not violate the Right to Privacy and does not amount to testimonial compulsion. 3.8. The Petitioner has not given the password of his mobile phone, or e-mail account, did not co-operate in the investigation; hence, the direction given by the Trial Court to unlock the mobile password of e-Mail addresses is justified and has not violated any rule of Law. The direction issued by the Trial Court to reveal the password to unlock his mobile phone and to open his e-Mail accounts does not amount to compelling him to be a witness