21
vance one's own business interests and
the expense of a competitor's may not constitute a wrong¬
ful act in the context of an action for unlawful compe¬
tition.
See Dun and Bradstreet (supra)at 221 C-E;
Ltd & Another
and compare Stellenbosch Wine Trust v. Oude Meester
( supra )at 162.
See also Prok Africa ( Pty ) Ltd
Group Ltd
Another v
NTH (Pty) Ltd & Others 1980 (3) SA 687(W) at 696.
In the case of Harvey Tiling (supra), it is clear
that, although there was no clear statement in the sum¬
mons to that effect, the cause of action was unfair comr
petition.
The first defendant, Rodomac, manufactured a
tile in competition with that manufactured by the plain¬
tiff ,Harvey Tiling.
The second defendant, Roux, had
been......
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents