26 "There is no question of granting applicant a monopoly in regard to the design of his hull . Anyone is entitled to design a hull with similar features. What applicant is entitled to be protected against is the use by first respondent of applicant's hull. as a starting point. First respon¬ dent must start from the beginning, not on the second or third rung of the ladder. Applicant is not entitled to be protected against another person evolving his own design similar to that of applicant, or even against the copying of his design, but he is entitled to be protected against the use of one of his hulls to form a mould, with or without modification. See Callman on Unfair Competition para 4.60." Counsel for Schultz submitted that the main question in the appeal was whether the copying of something which was not protected by the Copyright Act, the Patents Act or the Designs