LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
In 2014, New Hampshire amended a
statute meant to avoid vote buying and voter intimidation by newly
forbidding citizens from photographing their marked ballots and
publicizing such photographs.
While the photographs need not show
the voter, they often do and are commonly referred to as "ballot
selfies."
The statute imposes a fine of up to $1,000 for a
violation of the prohibition.
See N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 659:35,
IV; id. § 651:2, IV(a).
Three New Hampshire citizens who are under investigation
for violation of the revised statute, and who are represented by
the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire, challenged
the statute's constitutionality.
The district court held that the
statute is a content-based restriction of speech that on its face
violates the First Amendment.
3d 218, 221 (D.N.H. 2015).
Rideout v. Gardner, 123 F. Supp.
The New Hampshire Secretary of State
appeals, arguing that the statute is justified as a prophylactic
measure to prevent new technology from facilitating future vote
buying and voter coercion.
We affirm on the narrower ground that
the statute as amended fails to meet the test for intermediate
scrutiny under the First Amendment and that the statute's purposes
cannot justify the restrictions it imposes on speech.
I.
In
the
late
nineteenth
century,
political
parties,
unions, and other organizations had the power to print their own
- 3 -
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents