28 evidence in preparing and presenting his case'" [citation omitted]). Regarding the alleged delay in disclosing Colton's diary, the prosecutor promptly disclosed it to the defendants on learning of its existence in May, 2011, again, well before trial. This provided the defendants with a sufficient opportunity to investigate its contents and conduct a meaningful cross-examination of Colton. Finally, the defendants' due process rights were adequately protected given the defendants' unhampered ability to extensively cross-examine Colton and the jury's instruction to carefully weigh his testimony. The defendants have not demonstrated that any delays in receiving information legitimately prejudiced their opportunity to effectively prepare their defense. 5. Venue. During pretrial proceedings and prior to jury empanelment, William moved for dismissal of the charge of making a false report of child abuse, asserting lack of jurisdiction and improper venue under G. L. c. 277 § 57A.14 He argued that since the telephone call to DCF (located in Suffolk County) was made from Colton's home (in Middlesex County), the charge should 14 As only William was convicted of making a false report, Gail does not raise this argument on appeal.