Case: 12-57302, 05/18/2015, ID: 9540348, DktEntry: 197-1, Page 4 of 42 4 GARCIA V. GOOGLE succeed and that she had made an ample showing of irreparable harm. COUNSEL M. Cris Armenta, The Armenta Law Firm ACP, Los Angeles, California; Credence Sol, La Garenne, Chauvigng, France; and Jason Armstrong, Bozeman, Montana, for PlaintiffAppellant. Neal Kumar Katyal, Christopher T. Handman, Dominic F. Perella, and Sean Marotta, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C.; and Timothy Alger and Sunita Bali, Perkins Coie LLP, Palo Alto, California, for DefendantsAppellees Google, Inc. and YouTube LLC. Michael H. Page and Joseph C. Gratz, Durie Tangrie LLP, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae Netflix, Inc.. Christopher Jon Sprigman, New York University School of Law, New York, New York; Christopher Newman, George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, Virginia; and Jennifer S. Grannick, Stanford Law School, Stanford, California, for Amici Curiae Professors of Intellectual Property. Matt Schruers, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae Computer & Communications Industry Association. Corynne McSherry and Vera Ranieri, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California; Lee Rowland and Brian Hauss, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, New York; Sherwin Siy and John Bergmayer, Public