33 of this case Brajendra Gupta brought the original B. Tech admission form session 2014-15 of Budge Budge Institute of Technology of Animesh Boxi and authorisation letter given by Tapas Satpati, Registrar of Budge Budge Institute of Technology in favour of Brajendra Gupta and Tapas Satpati authorised the signature of Brajendra Gupta and the I.O. had seized those from Brajendra Gupta and prepared seizure list and he after reading and understanding its contents put his signature along with date (exhibit 9/1) and Gunasindhu Sahoo, S.I. of his cell also signed on the seizure list as a witness and Brajendra Gupta also signed on the seizure list. P.W. 11 identified the authorization letter and signed into it along with date (exhibit 11/3) and also the original B. Tech admission form session 2014 - 15 of Budge Budge Institute of Technology of Animesh Boxi and signed into it along with date (exhibit 10/1). P.W. 11 further stated that he could recollect the incident of 19/8/2017 and on that day reply came in the official email id occyber.cid-wb@gov.in from Google Law Enforcement and Pornhub Law Enforcement and he had downloaded those contents and had printed the same from the official printer and for using the official email address for this period and for doing this job Inspector Rajarshi Banerjee, O/C, Cyber Cell, CID, West Bengal gave him authorization and then Atanu Santra seized all the printed documents from him in presence of seizure witnesses and prepared seizure list and Inspector Rajarshi Banerjee and constable Ganesh Mondal signed on the seizure list as a witness and had identified signature along with date (exhibit 6/2) in the seizure list and P.W. 11 had signed into it after reading and understanding its content. P.W. 11 also stated that at the time of this seizure he had prepared a certificate u/s 65 B of Indian Evidence Act for authenticity of the downloaded printed email communications regarding the request and the response of Google Law Enforcement and Pornhub Law Enforcement and handed over the same to the I.O. of this case and identified the email communications which were downloaded and printed containing six pages printed and prepared by P.W. 11 using his official computer and in each of the six pages P.W. 11 had endorsed his signatures along with date and written “computer output made by me” and identified his signatures along with date and the endorsement “computer output made by me” (exhibits 8/8 to 8/11) and the first two pages contained the request letter by the I.O. to the