Previous 16 / 17 Next

CAP. 56 (b) (c) Public Order [Rev. 2022] conferred, may pass any sentence authorised for such offence other than a sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding ten years; if presided over by a Resident Magistrate, may pass any such sentence other than a sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years; and in any other case, may pass any such sentence other than a sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding five years. [Act No. 53 of 1960, s. 6, L.N. 87/1964, Act No. 19 of 2014, s. 11.] 22. Regulations (1) The Cabinet Secretary may make regulations prescribing anything which may be prescribed under this Act, and generally to give effect to the provisions of this Act. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e) of section 31 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act (Cap. 2), regulations under this section may prescribe such penalties as the Cabinet Secretary may think fit for the contravention thereof, not exceeding, however, the penalties specified in section 17 of this Act. [Act No. 53 of 1960, s. 6.] 16

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Public Order Act [1950]

Law

Status of Law: Final/Active/Current

Country

Kenya

Country Location

Latitude: 2.2319662848575907

Longitude: 37.627257845273796

Country Location (linked Law): Kenya

Keywords

Public Order

Adoption Date: Jan 1, 1950

Type of Law: Legislation

Research Category: V Other Laws

Is this the Official Copy?: Yes

Source URL: eKLR

Notes: The Public Order Act (Cap. 56), as revised in 2022, primarily focuses on regulating public gatherings, meetings, processions, and maintaining public order. It includes provisions related to curfews, prohibitions on offensive weapons, and penalties for violations. However, the Act does not explicitly address digital rights, as its focus is on physical public order and assemblies.

Potential Impacts on Digital Rights While the Act does not directly limit digital rights, there are a few indirect ways it could affect them:

Freedom of Expression and Assembly Online:

The Act regulates physical gatherings and processions, but if authorities interpret provisions expansively, they might apply similar logic to online assemblies or protests, particularly if these are organized online and then manifest in physical spaces. The requirement for notice and police approval for public gatherings might indirectly affect digital campaigns or mobilizations if they are seen as precursors to physical protests. Curfew Orders and Digital Communications:

Curfew orders under Part IV of the Act restrict movement during certain hours. This could indirectly affect digital rights if, during curfews, authorities attempt to restrict digital communications, especially if these are deemed to incite or organize curfew violations. Regulation and Surveillance:

While the Act does not provide for digital surveillance, its focus on public order could, in practice, lead to increased monitoring of digital spaces where public gatherings are organized or discussed. This could have a chilling effect on online freedom of expression. Conclusion Although the Public Order Act does not directly limit digital rights, its provisions regulating physical assemblies and maintaining public order could have indirect implications on digital rights, particularly freedom of expression and assembly. The potential for expansive interpretation by authorities could lead to situations where digital activities are scrutinized or restricted under the guise of maintaining public order.

If digital rights are a concern, it is essential to monitor how the Act is applied, especially in contexts where digital and physical spaces intersect, such as online mobilization for public protests.

Related Law (self)

Public Order Act [1950]

Collection

CIPIT

Date Updated: Aug 15, 2024

Complete Name: THE PUBLIC ORDER ACT CHAPTER 56

Primary Documents

Public Order Act Ke.pdf
English
Download View

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Select target paragraph3

Public Order Act [1950]

Primary Documents

Notifications