Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Value Car Group Ltd and another v Value Car Hire (Pty) Ltd and others [2005] 4 All SA 474 (C)

Case Law

Country

Country Location

Latitude: -28.58043087631903

Longitude: 24.820993917210945

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Keywords

Case Summary: The applicants and the first two respondents were all businesses whose names contained the word "Value". The applicants sought a final interdict preventing the respondents from using the trademark "Value". The case related essentially to an alleged passing off of the first respondent's services as those of the applicants. The applicants, bearing the burden of proof, failed to establish their reputation relating to the use of the word "value" and therefore had no actionable application leading to its dismissal.

Case Significance: The case reiterated that there are two basic requirements to be proved in an action relating to passing off. The first is the plaintiff's reputation in relation to the symbol which epitomizes his product. The second requirement is deception or confusion, on the part of a significant segment of the buying public, caused by the conduct of the defendant, as to the origin of the product or a trade connection with the defendant, and which would likely have an influence on their decision to procure it.

Related Caselaw (self)

Related Law

Notes: Case law explains that passing off is a wrong consisting of a false representation made by a trader to members of the purchasing public that the enterprise, goods or services of a rival trader either belong to him or are connected, in the course of trade, with his own enterprise, goods or services. To be actionable, the passing off must erode the plaintiff's goodwill. The Court found that the word"value" in this case, performed a descriptive function in the name of each of the businesses in this case. It was not in any way distinctive of either of the businesses nor was it characteristic of the goods or services in respect of which it was used. As the applicant's evidence did not establish that a substantial number of people regarded the word "value" as distinctive of its business, they were unable to establish their reputation relating to the use of the word "value".

Collection

Value Car Group Ltd and another v Value Car Hire (Pty) Ltd and others [2005] 4 All SA 474 (C).pdf
English
Download View