WP.Nos.5466 & 5470 of 2020 been intercepted only from the date mentioned in the order passed by the first respondent. Thereafter, the second respondent registered the case and completed investigation and filed final report and the same has been taken cognizance in CC.No.25 of 2016 on the file of the Special Court for CBI cases, Chennai for the offences under Section 120(b) of IPC read with Sections 7, 12, 13 (4), read with 13 (1) (b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act as against the accused A1 to A5 herein. Both the petitioners herein are arrayed as A4 and A5. In fact, A4 the petitioner in WP.No.5466 of 2020 filed discharge petition in Crl.MP.No.2180 of 2017 before the trial court and the same was dismissed and aggrieved by the same, the fourth accused filed revision petition before this Court in Crl.RC.No.783 of 2019 and A2 and A3 also filed quash petition to quash the criminal proceedings before this Court in Crl.OP.No.3903 of 2019. Both the criminal revision and the quash petition were dismissed by this Court by an order dated 03.10.2019. Therefore, already this Court elaborately discussed about the offence committed by the petitioners and the present writ petitions are nothing but clear abuse of process of court and prayed for dismissal of both the writ petitions. 8. http://www.judis.nic.in 10/22 Heard Mr.Sathish Parasaran, learned Senior Counsel