Issue 5. Whether there is breach of DPP 2 and Section 26 of PDPO? 11 DPP2(1) DPP2C1) DPP2(H No breach. Mo evidence of inaccurate data. Same as GL and X Same as GL and X S 26 Agreed at hearing that there is no breach of DPP2(1) re inaccurate data. Agreed at hearing that there is no accurate data therefore DPP2(1) does not apply. S 26 S 26 * . No breach. Purpose of Google Search is to provide means and assistance for members of the public to find information on the internet This purpose has not been completed or “fulfilled，，，and is still ongoing as long as information is available on the in"" " . , . Different from GL. Different from GL. Similar to PC. ternet. There is breach. Issue 6. Whether the “right to be forgotten” (“RfbF，，〉should be recognized in HK? 12 Right to be forgotten should NOT be recognized in Different from GL Same as PC HK without specific legislative amendment. Same as X Different from GL There is a "right to be forgotten”. Although at hearing, PC agreed that there is no general right and can only rely on DPP2 and s.26 Reference: sections i>5-()8 of Appellant%s reply statement Different from PC and X Google Spain is applicable in HK，as section 26 and DPP 2 were drafted based on 1995 EU Di- rective. The question is whether the links in question, should be delisted after considering the 13 criteria set out in the UK case of NT1 & NT2.