J14 Lord Denning proceeded to state the following at pages 498 and 499: “Whenever a statute remembered manifold is not that to believing in perfect clarity. cannot even terms work intention of parliament, social conditions which it was the written which passed but of the legislature..... constructive Judge should himself ask themselves come gave they have they would have done.” all draftsmen guilty of some trouble and then of the and he the and life” to the metaphor the question: If the ruck it out? in the of the mischief supplement must homely this draftsman. of finding task a appears, the into across and prescience a consideration it, to rise straightened would from do this not only from the from also to remedy, Put free the and blame so as to give “force word it a defect of it, when and he must statute, of the language divine with drafted the on it were, (of the statute that laments fold his hands simply the if certainly save the Judges In the absence to set must were be himself to be fettered by the else, It would of Parliament how them it must to foresee for this or that, or have been not provided had arise, and, for nothing and if Acts Act powers rule that he must look to the language or other ambiguity. He consideration, human may provide A Judge, document) Judge for it is not within possible supposed have up sets of facts which ambiguity..... or comes intention it is this: makers A of the texture of it, then do as He must