11 Judgment was delivered on 26 April 1984. In the judgment, MULLINS J referred to the modifications which Schultz alleged he had made but considered them to be the result of simple operations which did not affect the design of the hull as a whole. He said (at 580 B-D): "All these modifications ... had as their starting point a mould which itself had been constructed from one of applicant's hulls. It does not require much imagination to appreciate the saving to first respondent in time, labour, and money by reason of his using one of applicant's hulls as a plug. First respondent admits that building a plug is a laborious process, whether it is being built from scratch or whether it is being redesigned. Even if he had one of applicant's hulls available, from which he could take measurements, the construction of......