60 determined upon the question whether the difference in the registered Design of the right-angled finger support is or is not sufficient to make it an original Design within the meaning of the Act, or, whether, on the contrary, it is not an ordinary and natural al¬ teration of the shape of a known ar¬ ticle for the purpose of fitting it into a case or apparatus in which it is desired that it shall work.." and at p. 164 line 4 6 to p. 165 line 15: "In Le May v Welch (L.R. 28 C D . 34) Lord Justice BOWEN said:-'It is not every mere difference of cut,' - he was speaking of collars -'every change of outline, every change of length, or breadth, or configuration, in a simple and most familiar article of dress like this, which constitutes novelty of De¬ sign. To hold that would be to paralyse industry and to make the Patents, Designs traders