Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806 paying lakhs of money to Mr. Singhal, along with handing him all her jewellery. d) It is stated that as the funds of the Petitioner had depleted and she was unable to pay any more money to Mr. Singhal, he followed through on his threats and leaked the Petitioner’s explicit images on various pornographic websites without the consent or permission of the Petitioner. This led to the Petitioner addressing a complaint dated 03.08.2021 against Mr. Singhal to the SHO at Police Station Lajpat Nagar recording the new offences. The said complaint notes that Mr. Singhal had made a YouTube channel in the Petitioner’s name, and has been posting her explicit videos and photographs on a daily basis. e) Despite the Petitioner having approached the Grievance Cells of Respondents No. 3 to 6, i.e. Google LLC, Microsoft India Pvt. Ltd. (later replaced by Microsoft Ireland Operations Ltd. which is the entity managing its search engine, Bing), YouTube.com and Vimeo.com, as well as having placed multiple complaints on cybercrime.gov.in, the explicit images of the Petitioner were not taken down. f) Aggrieved by the failure in the redressal processes available to her, the Petitioner herein has approached this Court by way of the instant writ petition for directions to the Respondents for removal of all her non-consensual intimate images on the internet. 4. During the course of hearing of the instant writ petition, vide Order dated 11.08.2021, Respondent No.5 was deleted from the array of parties, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR Signing Date:26.04.2023 17:19:50 W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 Page 4 of 88

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents