reputation to the general public. That the news demonstrates him to be a person who is not honest, a person who misused his office and a conman. While the truth is; he has never owned any land being by way of purchase or grant by any means in Arusha Region. No any of his Companies conducted the business of buying land from a foreigner or any person in Arusha. The witness further professed that in totality it is not true that his company sold the land to NHC at inflated price. Therefore, it is PW1’s assertion that the allegation that he used a contractor hired by NHC to prepare access roads on his private land that is close to the Safari City Project using NHC funds is not true as there was no any NHC contractor who used to construct access road on his land, as he had no any land thereto by that time even up to the time the Petitioner was testifying. Likewise, PW1 denied the published information that, he made the decision without involving the head of NHC Procurement Unit. He testified that in procurement procedures the decision is made by Procurement Board and not by Director General. He contended further that in his employment he has never taken power in procuring Board’s decision. With regard to the allegation that; “a Company which his wife was a director was given a contract to provide insurance covers for NHC houses in Mtwara contrary to Public Service Rules on conflict of interest”, PW1 disputed 9