Submitting on the unjust violation Mr. Mpoki argued that, the petitioner's right to receive information was curtailed and further to that her right to seek, receive and disseminate information as provided in the Constitution was violated. He also stated that the act of not calling the owners to defend themselves was a violation of the principle of natural justice and that, the said act of cancellation of license to print newspapers has a chilling effect on the exercise of the Constitutional right to seek, receive and impart information which is contrary to the principle of natural justice. He further alleged that, there is a right for a person aggrieved to appeal to against the Order, but in the section which provides for the right to appeal, provide only three grounds of appeal which is a curtailment and violation of fair hearing and the right to be heard, as provided for in the constitution. He added further that, there is a room for a person aggrieved to seek redress to the Minister, whatever the term means, which is another violation as the Constitution allows a person aggrieved to appeal and not to seek redress as indicated under section 10(1) and (3) of the Media. Clarifying the petitioner's claims, he suggested four issues to assist the Court in determination of the petition. One whether the 5