Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance Part 7 7-10 Section 61 Cap. 593 engaged in, was responsible under the immediate authority of the directors of the company for the internal management of the company; 61. (b) in the case of a partnership— (i) any partner in the partnership who, at the time the act was done or the conduct was engaged in, was responsible for the internal management of the partnership; or (ii) if there was no such partner, any person who, at the time the act was done or the conduct was engaged in, was responsible under the immediate authority of the partners in the partnership for the internal management of the partnership; and (c) in the case of any other organization, any officer of the organization or other person who, at the time the act was done or the conduct was engaged in, was responsible for the internal management of the organization. (2) A person charged with an offence under this Ordinance by virtue of subsection (1) is taken not to have done the act in question or not to have engaged in the conduct in question if— (a) sufficient evidence is adduced to raise an issue that he did not authorize the act to be done or the conduct to be engaged in; and (b) the contrary is not proved by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. Transactions relating to contravention not void or voidable A transaction is not void or voidable by reason only that a contravention of any of the provisions of this Ordinance has taken place in relation to or as a result of the transaction. Last updated date 2.8.2012