- 9 A B A including the public profile of Yeung, his involvement in the B entertainment business, the subject matter of the Words possibly being of C D continuing interest, the popularity/commonplace nature of “googling” about persons, and the ready accessibility of the Autocomplete and C D Related Searches features to internet users (which are the very factors E F McCallum J referred to in Bleyer for drawing inference as to the likely scope of publication), before concluding it is an open question of fact, by E F inference or otherwise, that there may have been real and substantial G G publication. H H 16. I J Indeed, in the Decision I have gone further to analyse the inference that arguably can be drawn from the statistical information in the Yuen Aff which has led me to the view that had there been material I J non-disclosure at the ex parte stage (which I do not agree) I would not K L M N have set aside the Leave Order or alternatively I would have re-granted the same. 17. K L Mr McCoy SC has not persuaded me the present context is, as he has suggested, identifical to that of Bleyer where the plaintiff M N simply produced no evidence upon which an inference could be made of O substantial publication of the offending words. P P 18. Q R O Next, Mr McCoy SC in his written submissions for the Leave Hearing has emphasised it will be a disproportionate engagement of the court’s resources to allow Yeung to proceed with his libel claim Q R based on mere publication to users of the IT Dept and ILL. S S T T U U V V